Natasha Richardson and Canadian health care

March 22nd, 2009 | by Brian Schwartz |

From an AP story last week:

… questions are arising over whether a medical helicopter might have been able to save the ailing actress.

The province of Quebec lacks a medical helicopter system, common in the United States and other parts of Canada, to airlift stricken patients to major trauma centers. Montreal’s top head trauma doctor said Friday that may have played a role in Richardson’s death. …

“…Our system isn’t set up for traumas and doesn’t match what’s available in other Canadian cities, let alone in the States,” said Tarek Razek, director of trauma services for the McGill University Health Centre, which represents six of Montreal’s hospitals. …

Not being airlifted directly to a trauma center could have cost Richardson crucial moments, Razek said.

(Via David R. Henderson at EconLog.)

tags:
  • kmw
    Apologies if I'm just dense, but I'm not sure what the point is supposed to be here. There are areas in the US where an injured person wouldn't have access to a medical helicopter either. The article states that medical helicopter networks are available in other Canadian cities. Isn't this more an incident of poor planning than a good example of why the Canadian healthcare system is inferior to the US?



    Brian replies: Yes, I agree that this example cannot prove support any strong argument. That's why I did not elaborate on it much.
blog comments powered by Disqus