Mandatory insurance, but less access in Massachusetts

public insurance plan, government medical careYet an other example of how having medical “coverage” does not mean getting needed care, here’s one more warning to those who want mandatory insurance. From John R. Graham at StateHouseCall:

A recent white paper by the New England Healthcare Institute suggests that access to primary care in Massachusetts is actually worse than in other states, where health insurance is voluntary.  Remaking Primary Care: From Crisis to Opportunity, reports data from the Massachusetts Medical Society. The share of primary-care practices accepting new patients dropped significantly from 2006 to 2008: 90% to 78% in pediatrics, 69% to 52% in internal medicine, and 75% to 65% in family medicine (p. 13, figure 3).

See also “Socialized Medicine and Doctor Shortages” by David Catrone.

Similar Posts:

This entry was posted in coverage isn't care and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://www.city-data.com/forum/politics-other-controversies/1020801-obama-care-unintended-consequences.html#post14877188 Obama care unintended consequences – Politics and Other Controversies -Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Conservatives, Liberals, Third Parties, Left-Wing, Right-Wing, Congress, President – City-Data Forum

    [...] We haven’t even seen the tip of the iceberg. Obamacare will destroy health care in the US. A Neurosurgeon friend of mine just got his rates cut by 42% (as did other specialists). So, the long term impact will be a huge shortage of specialists. If you want to see what it will look like, just look at Massachusetts. The examples are endless. "Yet an other example of how having medical