Challenging mandatory insurance in court

January 7th, 2010 | by Brian Schwartz |

From the AP:

Opponents of the health care reform bill are not giving up the fight, and some think their last, best hope to halt the legislation lies not in the Capitol but in the court across the street.

A small but vocal contingent of legal scholars and many Republican lawmakers argues the measures passed by both chambers are unconstitutional and will be ruled so by the Supreme Court. Their primary target: the individual mandate, which requires people to get health insurance or pay a financial penalty of at least 2 percent of their income to the government.

If the Supreme Court strikes this down (as it should), I figure a work-around would be to (1) impose federal mandates on what is acceptable insurance, (2) raise everyone’s taxes and (3) provide a tax credit for buying said insurance.  Yes, this is evil. So why give anyone ideas?  Well, I won’t flatter myself into thinking that I’m the first.

tags: ,
blog comments powered by Disqus