Who’s exempt from new insurance mandates?

The New York Post reports:

Good old Joe Biden, introducing Barack Obama at the health-care bill-signing lollapalooza in Washington yesterday, leaned over and whispered into the presidential ear (and a nearby open mike): “This is a big f—ing deal.”

Sure was — though not personally to Veep Potty-Mouth, nor to the president.

They’re exempt, you see.

Really.

No worrying for them about the personal consequences of ObamaCare‘s overbearing regulation, worrisome coverage uncertainties and financial confusions.

Same for members of the presidential Cabinet — and all of their staff members.

They and their families are exempt from the calamitous health-care “reform” plan they’ve hung on the rest of the country. …

CBS News reports:

… page 158 of the legislation, which appears to create a carve out for senior staff members in the leadership offices and on congressional committees, essentially exempting those senior Democrat staffers who wrote the bill from being forced to purchase health care plans in the same way as other Americans.

A major story during the course of the health care debate was whether members of Congress would commit to placing themselves in the same health care exchanges as average citizens, or whether they would hang on to their government plans – that’s why leadership chose to add this portion to the bill, serving as a guarantee that members would participate in the same health plans as the people. Here’s the relevant text: …

Read the whole article for the relevant text and analysis.

See also my post from last summer: Congress & gov’t employees would be exempt from new insurance mandates

(news item via FIRM)

Similar Posts:

This entry was posted in Policy - National, PPC and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • patsearcy

    Congress & gov’t employees would be exempt from the new insurance mandates, but that does not mean that no gov’t employees will be impacted by this gov’t overreach.

    Many government employees have a terrific health care plan called the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHB). As a retiree from the federal government I appreciate very much the big advantage I have from being insured through this plan. However, I am still extremely worried that since my health insurance is carried through a private company – Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield – then it’s only a matter of time before they are force out of business and that I, along with millions of other current and former gov’t employees will end up being forced into a health plan run completely by the government.

    One of my many duties as a soldier in the Army National Guard was that of a payroll clerk for my unit. I saw and experienced first hand the bureaucratic idiocy and ineptitude that is pervasive in our government. It scares the hell out of me to realize that there is a real possibility that my life and that of my wife may end up with in the hands of the same types of people who cannot even get noble and courageous soldiers paid properly. I am literally sick to my stomach over the health care bill passed by Congress and signed by Barack Obama.

    If the Statist Democrats had proposed a bill that gave American citizens the same health care plan as that of the FEHB, there would be very little, if any, opposition to that proposal. But since they didn’t, and since they passed a plan that has the real potential to destroy the private health care insurance industry, then they will, by default, destroy the basic premise of the FEHB. Incidentally, during the health care summit with Barack Obama one Democrat disingenuously stated outright that their proposal was exactly the same plan as the FEHB and even compounded that dishonesty by saying that the Republicans were complaining about American citizens getting the same plan enjoyed by members of Congress.

    Citizens should not fear its government, but the government ought to fear its citizens!

  • patsearcy

    Congress & gov’t employees would be exempt from the new insurance mandates, but that does not mean that no gov’t employees will be impacted by this gov’t overreach.

    Many government employees have a terrific health care plan called the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHB). As a retiree from the federal government I appreciate very much the big advantage I have from being insured through this plan. However, I am still extremely worried that since my health insurance is carried through a private company – Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield – then it’s only a matter of time before they are force out of business and that I, along with millions of other current and former gov’t employees will end up being forced into a health plan run completely by the government.

    One of my many duties as a soldier in the Army National Guard was that of a payroll clerk for my unit. I saw and experienced first hand the bureaucratic idiocy and ineptitude that is pervasive in our government. It scares the hell out of me to realize that there is a real possibility that my life and that of my wife may end up with in the hands of the same types of people who cannot even get noble and courageous soldiers paid properly. I am literally sick to my stomach over the health care bill passed by Congress and signed by Barack Obama.

    If the Statist Democrats had proposed a bill that gave American citizens the same health care plan as that of the FEHB, there would be very little, if any, opposition to that proposal. But since they didn’t, and since they passed a plan that has the real potential to destroy the private health care insurance industry, then they will, by default, destroy the basic premise of the FEHB. Incidentally, during the health care summit with Barack Obama one Democrat disingenuously stated outright that their proposal was exactly the same plan as the FEHB and even compounded that dishonesty by saying that the Republicans were complaining about American citizens getting the same plan enjoyed by members of Congress.

    Citizens should not fear its government, but the government ought to fear its citizens!

  • wakalix

    Pat, thanks for your thoughtful comments. FYI, here's a post about the FEHB that suggests it's not so great:
    http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/12/09/fehbp…

  • http://www.patientpowernow.org/2009/06/22/congress-federal-employees-exempt-insurance-mandates/ Congress exempt from the Affordable Health Choices Act | Independence Institute: Patient Power

    [...] Update: see my March 25, 2010 post, Who’s exempt from new insurance mandates? [...]

  • wakalix

    Pat, thanks for your thoughtful comments. FYI, here's a post about the FEHB that suggests it's not so great:
    http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/12/09/fehbp-plan-is-no-moderate-compromise/

  • patsearcy

    Thanks for the info about the FEHB. Most of the claims written in the CATO
    article are things I was not aware of. However, we cannot try so hard to
    find a perfect system that we discount a system that is much better than the
    one passed and signed into law earlier this week.

    One reason premiums have been raised is because the cost of doing business
    in health care insurance has risen at ridiculous rates. I can drive to a
    medical supply company in north-west Denver and purchase my medical supplies
    from them for around $90 each time I need them. But they don't participate
    with my insurance company. My insurance company participates with another
    medical supply company that will ship my supplies and charge me just $18.
    But they charge the insurance company $248 for something I can get myself
    for just $90.

    My main points about the advantages of going with a plan like the FEHB are
    fairly numerous. Assuming that there isn't a mandate for citizens to
    purchase health insurance through an FEHB-style plan under the threat of
    taxation fines and imprisonment, we wouldn't have to spend $10 billion for
    new IRS agents. We might have a better chance at allowing the market to
    decide whether or not the program survives, not some pin-headed bureaucracy
    with a hatred for private industry.

    Pat

  • patsearcy

    Thanks for the info about the FEHB. Most of the claims written in the CATO

    article are things I was not aware of. However, we cannot try so hard to

    find a perfect system that we discount a system that is much better than the

    one passed and signed into law earlier this week.

    One reason premiums have been raised is because the cost of doing business

    in health care insurance has risen at ridiculous rates. I can drive to a

    medical supply company in north-west Denver and purchase my medical supplies

    from them for around $90 each time I need them. But they don't participate

    with my insurance company. My insurance company participates with another

    medical supply company that will ship my supplies and charge me just $18.

    But they charge the insurance company $248 for something I can get myself

    for just $90.

    My main points about the advantages of going with a plan like the FEHB are

    fairly numerous. Assuming that there isn't a mandate for citizens to

    purchase health insurance through an FEHB-style plan under the threat of

    taxation fines and imprisonment, we wouldn't have to spend $10 billion for

    new IRS agents. We might have a better chance at allowing the market to

    decide whether or not the program survives, not some pin-headed bureaucracy

    with a hatred for private industry.

    Pat