Monthly Archives: October 2010

Amendment 63 protects your individual rights

A and virtually fact-free editorial in the Aurora Sentinel says Amendment 63 “has nothing to do with rights and everything to do with legislative wrongs.” Wrong. It has everything to with rights and preventing legislative wrongs. Continue reading

Posted in Amendment 63, PPC | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Health care lawsuit moves forward

The Atlantic reports on the multi-state legal challenge to the health control bill, HR 3590. Remember, Amendment 63 will be even more important should the lawsuit succeed.  Reports the Atlantic: On Thursday, a federal judge in Florida ruled that a … Continue reading

Posted in Policy - National | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Colorado Amendment 63

[Scroll down for most recent blog posts.] Election results for Amendment 63. Amendment text Commentary in support of Amendment 63 & refuting the opposition Latest blog posts about Amendment 63 How you can promote Amendment 63. Watch the Amendment 63 … Continue reading

Posted in Amendment 63 | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Make a word meaningless: add “social” in front of it!

Michael Cannon at the Cato Institute makes a great point: [HuffPo blogger Jesse Larner writes that] “Cannon is not in favor of universal coverage as a social right.” True, that.  “As a libertarian, he doesn’t even recognize the concept of … Continue reading

Posted in myths & fallacies, PPC | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Colorado Amendment 63 vs. the “endless lawsuit” argument

A common argument against Amendment 63 is that it “will lead to endless lawsuits.” This is like opposing the First Amendment because of potential lawsuits from people seeking to use government to restrict your free speech. Continue reading

Posted in Amendment 63, Medicaid/Medicare/SCHIP, PPC | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

“You can keep your health insurance…if you BEG hard enough for an Obamacare waiver.”

That’s Michelle Malkin on ObamaCare (HR 3590), in her post titled “Obamacare waivers: Torquemada Sebelius spares McDonald’s, unions.” (via Ari Armstrong.) Similar Posts: The 12 Worst Features Of ObamaCare ObamaCare waivers & crony capitalism ObamaCare waivers: over 100 served Who … Continue reading

Posted in Policy - National, PPC | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Amendment 63: keeping you out of jail

Check out this new video on Colorado Amendment 63: See also this related post: Jail time for not having (legal) health insurance? and read the text of the Amendment. More health care videos. Similar Posts: Health care bill: fly government … Continue reading

Posted in Amendment 63 | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Dave Kopel on Michigan ObamaCare lawsuit

Dave Kopel writes in the Daily Caller: Thursday’s decision in Thomas More Law Center v. Obama is a short-term victory for President Obama’s health control law. Yet a close reading of the case suggests that the law may have a … Continue reading

Posted in Policy - National | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Amendment 63 vs. the elitist vision of the anointed

Two good letters to the editor in support of Colorado Amendment 63 – health care choice. Continue reading

Posted in Amendment 63, PPC | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Amendment 63: freedom is too “haphazard” for Bell Policy Center

Bob Semro of the Bell Policy Center writes that Amendment 63 would “move Colorado to a less protected, more haphazard health care system where people pay directly for services rather than having health insurance.” In other words, he doesn’t like when people have the freedom to be paying customers. Continue reading

Posted in Amendment 63 | Tagged , , | Leave a comment